--- title: "Civil appeals, revisions and execution, Ernakulam" description: "Civil appeals, revisions and execution: 24 matters, each with the law, forum, procedure, documents and limitation. RFA against Sub Court decree –…" url: "https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/" image: "https://advaslam.com/og.png" --- Civil, consumer & property # Civil appeals, revisions and execution 24 matters from the Civil, consumer & property index. Each entry sets out the problem, the law, the forum, the procedure, the documents usually needed and the limitation clock. General information only — verify the current position on your facts before acting. **Contents** 1. RFA against Sub Court decree – Ernakulam 2. RFA valuation and court-fee check 3. RSA – substantial question of law 4. RSA – concurrent findings challenge 5. MFA against Order 43 appealable orders 6. CMA against temporary injunction – Or.39 R.1-2 7. CRP – civil revision 8. OP(C) – Article 227 supervisory 9. Caveat – Section 148A CPC 10. Execution petition – Order 21 11. Execution – Or.21 Rule 32 disobedience 12. Transferred decree execution 13. Condonation of delay – appeals 14. Ex-parte decree – Or.IX R.13 vs Sec.96 appeal 15. Cross-objection – Or.XLI R.22 16. Stay of execution – Or.XLI R.5 17. LAR appeal – compensation enhancement (Sec.74 RFCTLARR) 18. Settlement / mediation referral in appeals – Sec.89 19. RCR – rent-control revision (Kerala Buildings Lease & Rent Control Act) 20. MACA – MACT award quantum appeal (S.173 MV Act) 21. Transfer petition under Section 24 CPC – shifting a civil case between courts 22. Original Petition (Civil) under Article 227 against execution court order 23. Original Petition (Civil) under Article 227 against Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal interim order 24. RERA authority and appellate tribunal orders — writ versus statutory appeal note ## RFA against Sub Court decree – Ernakulam Lost a money / property / declaration suit in Sub Court, Ernakulam and need first appeal. What it involvesRe-appreciation of facts and law on evidence record. Relevant lawSec.96 CPC; Or.XLI CPC; Kerala Court Fees Act valuation. ForumDistrict-tier decree → First Appeal (RFA) before Hon'ble High Court of Kerala. District work is feeder; HC decides. Procedure & stageCertified copy, valuation check, grounds, stay application, paper-book. RemedySet aside / modify decree, remand, cross-objection by respondent. High Court connectionDirect – RFA filed and argued in HC. Documents normally requiredCertified judgment-decree, pleadings, exhibits list, fee receipts, ID. LimitationRFA – 90 days from decree (Limitation Act Art.116, with Sec.5 condonation + copy-exclusion). Delay needs separate affidavit. **Related:** Stay of execution, cross-objection, RSA. **Can new evidence be filed in RFA?** Only under Or.XLI R.27 leave, not as of right. ## RFA valuation and court-fee check Appeal memo returned for deficit fee or wrong valuation. What it involvesSubject-matter valuation carried from plaint. Relevant lawKerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1959; Or.XLI. ForumSub Court Ernakulam (record) → HC (RFA registry scrutiny). Procedure & stageReconcile plaint valuation, check ad-valorem slabs, pay deficit before curing defect. RemedyProper admission without dismissal for defect. High Court connectionRegistry objection handling in HC. Documents normally requiredPlaint valuation para, fee receipts, decree valuation. LimitationCure defects within registry time; appeal limitation 90 days still applies. **Related:** RFA filing, CMA. **Is fee refunded if appeal settles?** As per refund rules on compromise – court orders. ## RSA – substantial question of law First appeal also lost; only legal error remains. What it involvesNo re-hearing of facts – only substantial question of law. Relevant lawSec.100 CPC as amended; Sec.100A (no further appeal); Or.XLII. ForumDistrict / Sub Court first-appeal judgment → RSA before High Court of Kerala. Procedure & stageFrame questions in memo, admission hearing on questions, notice only if satisfied. RemedyAdmission and setting aside on legal error, remand. High Court connectionEntirely HC. Documents normally requiredBoth lower judgments, framed questions, relevant exhibits. LimitationRSA – 90 days; condonation under Sec.5 with explanation per day. **Related:** CRP, review. **Can concurrent facts be reopened?** Only if perverse / no evidence / misreading – narrow. ## RSA – concurrent findings challenge Two courts concurrently held against you on facts. What it involvesPerversity / non-consideration / inadmissible evidence test. Relevant lawSec.100 CPC; precedents on perversity threshold. ForumHC in RSA jurisdiction. Procedure & stagePinpoint perversity paragraph-wise, link to exhibit numbers. RemedyInterference only if jurisdictional legal failure shown. High Court connectionHC admission filter. Documents normally requiredDepositions extracts, exhibit contradictions chart. Limitation90 days. **Related:** OP(C), review. **Is disagreement with appreciation enough?** No – must show legal flaw. ## MFA against Order 43 appealable orders Interim order (injunction, receiver, etc.) needs immediate appeal. What it involvesOrders appealable under Or.XLIII R.1. Relevant lawOr.XLIII R.1 r/w Sec.104 CPC. ForumMunsiff Court Ernakulam orders → appeal to District Court (30 days, Art.116(b)); Sub Court (and above) orders → MFA before High Court of Kerala (90 days, Art.116(a)). Procedure & stageCertified order copy, MFA with stay petition, urgency memo if needed. RemedyStay / modification of interim order. High Court connectionHC MFA jurisdiction for Sub Court orders; District appeal track is feeder. Documents normally requiredImpugned order, lower pleadings, commission report if any. Limitation30 days from Munsiff Court orders (Art.116(b)); 90 days from Sub Court orders (Art.116(a)); interim relief sought early – delay weakens equity. **Related:** CMA, OP(C). **Are all interim orders appealable?** No – only Or.43 enumerated orders; others via OP(C). ## CMA against temporary injunction – Or.39 R.1-2 Injunction granted or refused by trial court. What it involvesPrima facie, balance of convenience, irreparable injury. Relevant lawOr.XXXIX R.1-2; Or.XLIII R.1(r). ForumTrial court Ernakulam → appellate court under Or.XLIII R.1(r) (CMA/MFA per forum); no second appeal from the appellate order (S.104(2) CPC) – HC thereafter generally via OP(C) (Art.227). Procedure & stageAppeal with records, stay / status-quo application. RemedyGrant, vacate, or modify injunction with conditions. High Court connectionIf CMA fails or jurisdictional error, HC under Art.227. Documents normally requiredInjunction order, plaint, affidavits, photos/survey records. Limitation30 days where the appeal lies to the District Court (Art.116(b)); 90 days for an MFA to the HC (Art.116(a)) – file promptly, seek interim orders early. **Related:** Injunction suit, caveat. **Does filing appeal automatically stay injunction?** No – separate stay needed. ## CRP – civil revision Lower court acted without jurisdiction or with material irregularity, no appeal available. What it involvesJurisdictional error only. Relevant lawSec.115 CPC (as applicable in Kerala); Kerala amendments. ForumMunsiff / Sub Court order → CRP before High Court of Kerala. Procedure & stageCRP with impugned order, jurisdictional grounds, stay petition. RemedySetting aside for jurisdictional error. High Court connectionDirect HC. Documents normally requiredImpugned order, relevant pleadings. Limitation90 days (Art.131); prompt filing aids stay. **Related:** OP(C), RSA. **CRP vs OP(C)?** CRP under Sec.115; OP(C) under Art.227 where revision barred – grounds overlap but source differs. ## OP(C) – Article 227 supervisory Procedural order causing grave injustice but not appealable/revisable. What it involvesSupervisory correction, not merits appeal. Relevant lawArt.227 Constitution of India; HC OP(C) procedure. ForumAny subordinate civil court in Ernakulam → High Court of Kerala. Procedure & stageOP(C) with exhibits, urgency if trial progressing. RemedyDirection to decide, quash perverse procedural order, time-bound disposal direction. High Court connectionEntirely HC. Documents normally requiredFull procedural chain exhibits, prior orders. LimitationNo fixed limitation – file promptly; delay / laches defeats discretion. **Related:** CRP, MFA. **Can OP(C) re-argue merits?** No – confined to jurisdictional / manifest error. ## Caveat – Section 148A CPC Fear of ex-parte injunction or stay in a property / contract dispute. What it involvesRight of hearing before interim order. Relevant lawSec.148A CPC – 90-day life. ForumMunsiff / Sub / District Court Ernakulam; HC if appeal anticipated. Procedure & stageCaveat petition with address for notice, serve on expected petitioner. RemedyNo ex-parte order without hearing caveator. High Court connectionSeparate HC caveat if RFA/MFA expected. Documents normally requiredID, address, subject-matter details. LimitationValid 90 days – renew if dispute persists. **Related:** Injunction, CMA. **Does caveat guarantee no adverse order?** No – only guarantees hearing. ## Execution petition – Order 21 Decree in hand but no recovery / possession. What it involvesMode selection – attachment, sale, delivery, arrest (limited). Relevant lawOr.XXI CPC; Sec.51, 55-59; Kerala amendments. ForumExecuting court Ernakulam (court that passed decree or transferee court) → HC revision on jurisdictional error. Procedure & stageEP with certified decree, mode prayer, notice under Or.XXI R.22 where required. RemedyAttachment/sale/delivery with police aid where ordered. High Court connectionEPs yielding jurisdictional errors reach HC via CRP/OP(C). Documents normally requiredCertified decree, prior EP history, asset details, affidavit of balance. Limitation12 years for execution (Art.136); prompt filing aids recovery. **Related:** Transferred decree, R.32. **Is fresh suit needed if judgment-debtor transferred assets?** No – use attachment + voidable transfer remedies. ## Execution – Or.21 Rule 32 disobedience Injunction / specific act decree disobeyed. What it involvesDetention / attachment as coercion, not punishment alone. Relevant lawOr.XXI R.32 CPC; contempt overlap. ForumExecuting court Ernakulam → HC on revision. Procedure & stageApplication proving willful disobedience, opportunity to comply, coercive orders. RemedyDetention in civil prison (limits apply) + attachment till compliance. High Court connectionProportionality review in HC. Documents normally requiredDecree, violation proof (photos/panchnama), prior notices. LimitationWithin execution limitation; file promptly after breach. **Related:** Injunction, specific performance execution. **Is R.32 a contempt?** It is execution-coercion; separate Contempt of Court Act remedy may co-exist. ## Transferred decree execution Decree from outside Ernakulam / outside Kerala needs enforcement here. What it involvesTransfer certificate and territorial execution. Relevant lawSec.39-42 CPC; Or.XXI R.6-8. ForumTransferor court → District / Sub Court Ernakulam as transferee. Procedure & stageTransfer application, certificate + non-satisfaction memo, fresh EP in Ernakulam. RemedyFull transferee powers except matters requiring transferor variation. High Court connectionObjections on transfer validity to HC. Documents normally requiredCertified decree, transfer certificate, asset address proof. Limitation12-year execution period continues; transfer time excluded with diligence. **Related:** Execution-21, condonation. **Can transferee court vary decree?** No – only execute; variation goes back to passing court. ## Condonation of delay – appeals RFA / RSA / MFA filed beyond 90 days, or Mat.Appeal filed beyond the 30-day default under FCA S.19(3) / the 90-day Kerala practice window. What it involvesSufficient cause day-by-day. Relevant lawSec.5 Limitation Act; Sec.12 exclusion of copy time; Art.116; FCA S.19(3) (Mat.Appeal). ForumHigh Court of Kerala (condonation application in appeal). Procedure & stageSeparate affidavit explaining each day, medical / counsel-change proof, certified-copy timeline. RemedyAdmission if cause shown; otherwise dismissal at threshold. High Court connectionEntirely HC discretion. Documents normally requiredCopy application receipts, medical records, affidavit. LimitationFile with appeal – no separate limitation but promptness matters. Mat.Appeal: file within 30 days (FCA S.19(3); Arunoday Singh v. Lee Anne Elton (SC, 23.07.2021)); if filed in 30–90 days, file with condonation application (Kerala practice has applied 90 days for HMA decrees – Viswanathan P.K. v. Sindhu M.K., 2009 (4) KHC 307). MACA 90 days (separate track). **Related:** RFA, RSA, Mat.Appeal. **Is 10-day delay automatic?** No – each day needs explanation. ## Ex-parte decree – Or.IX R.13 vs Sec.96 appeal Decree passed without contesting – set aside or appeal? What it involvesStrategic choice of remedy. Relevant lawOr.IX R.13; Sec.96(2); Or.XLI. ForumSame trial court Ernakulam (R.13) or appellate court / HC (appeal). District feeder. Procedure & stageR.13 with summons-non-service / sufficient-cause proof; appeal on merits in parallel only with election care. RemedyRestoration and retrial, or appellate reversal. High Court connectionAppeal from Sub Court ex-parte decree lies to HC. Documents normally requiredSummons endorsement, address proof, laying-evidence of non-service. LimitationR.13 – 30 days from decree / knowledge (Art.123); appeal 90 days. **Related:** Condonation, transfer petition. **Can both be pursued together?** Election and stay strategy matters – simultaneous prosecution needs careful drafting to avoid conflict. ## Cross-objection – Or.XLI R.22 Respondent partly aggrieved but did not file appeal. What it involvesChallenge without separate appeal. Relevant lawOr.XLI R.22 CPC. ForumHigh Court of Kerala in pending RFA/MFA. Procedure & stageCross-objection within one month of notice (extendable), with grounds + fee. RemedyVariation in respondent's favour without separate RFA. High Court connectionArgued with main RFA. Documents normally requiredDecree portions challenged, fee. LimitationOne month from service of appeal notice (condonable). **Related:** RFA, stay. **Must cross-objector have appealed?** No – that is the point of R.22. ## Stay of execution – Or.XLI R.5 Decree-holder pressing execution while appeal pending. What it involvesSubstantial loss + security balance. Relevant lawOr.XLI R.5; Or.XLI R.6 (security). ForumHC in RFA (stay petition) + executing court Ernakulam compliance. Procedure & stageStay IA with loss affidavit, offer of security, notice to decree-holder. RemedyStay on terms, deposit, or time-bound disposal. High Court connectionHC stay jurisdiction. Documents normally requiredDecree, EP notices, loss/security details. LimitationSeek immediately on filing appeal – before coercive steps. **Related:** Execution-21, caveat. **Does mere filing of appeal stay execution?** No – express stay order required. ## LAR appeal – compensation enhancement (Sec.74 RFCTLARR) LARR award / reference compensation inadequate for Ernakulam land. What it involvesMarket value, solatium, interest, rehabilitation. Relevant lawRight to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 – Sec.64 reference, Sec.74 appeal. ForumLARR Authority (feeder) → Appeal to High Court of Kerala. Procedure & stageReference application, evidence of comparables, appeal with valuation. RemedyEnhancement with solatium + interest. High Court connectionDirect statutory appeal to HC. Documents normally requiredAward, comparable sale deeds, notification dates, possession proof. LimitationAppeal under Sec.74(1) within 60 days from the date of the Authority's award; HC may allow a further period of up to 60 days on sufficient cause (proviso) – no 90-day analogue. **Related:** Survey, title verification. **Can new comparables be filed in appeal?** With leave and proof they were unavailable earlier. ## Settlement / mediation referral in appeals – Sec.89 Appeal capable of negotiated closure (partition, money, boundary). What it involvesConfidential mediation without merits concession. Relevant lawSec.89 CPC; Mediation Act, 2023; Kerala mediation norms. ForumHC mediation centre / District mediation Ernakulam on reference. Procedure & stageJoint request or court reference, mediated settlement, decree on settlement. RemedyConsent decree with fee-refund benefit, finality. High Court connectionHC refers and records settlement. Documents normally requiredSettlement terms draft, title/payment schedule. LimitationCan be sought at any stage before judgment. **Related:** All civil appeals. **Is mediation admission usable if talks fail?** No – confidential and without prejudice. ## RCR – rent-control revision (Kerala Buildings Lease & Rent Control Act) Appellate Authority confirmed eviction / fixation order with jurisdictional or legality error. What it involvesRent Control Court → Appellate Authority → revision chain. Relevant lawKerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 – S.18 appeal (30 days, copy time excluded); S.20 revision; S.20A remand. ForumRent Control Court (feeder) → Appellate Authority (S.18) → revision under S.20: District Court where the appellate authority is a Subordinate Judge, High Court in other cases; no intermediate revisional tier. Procedure & stageCertified appellate order, revision memo on legality/jurisdiction, stay IA. RemedySetting aside/remand; stay of eviction pending revision. High Court connectionRevisional-order legality tested before HC. Documents normally requiredLease/rent records, RC + appellate orders, payment proof, ID. LimitationThe Act prescribes no revision period – S.20 lets the revisional court act "at any time"; file promptly and explain any delay; seek stay alongside. **Related:** S.11 eviction, stay of execution. **Fresh evidence in revision?** Only on legality record – no re-trial. ## MACA – MACT award quantum appeal (S.173 MV Act) MACT award too low (victim) or excessive/erroneous (insurer/owner) – quantum and liability both live. What it involvesIncome, multiplier, deduction, interest, contributory negligence. Relevant lawMotor Vehicles Act, 1988 – S.173 appeal (deposit and floor under S.173(1)-(2)). ForumMACT Ernakulam (feeder) → Appeal to High Court of Kerala. Procedure & stageCertified award, quantum chart with multiplier working, grounds on liability/quantum, statutory deposit as ordered. RemedyEnhancement / reduction / remand with interest correction. High Court connectionDirect statutory appeal to HC. Documents normally requiredAward, claim petition, income proofs, medical/disability records, policy, deposit receipt. Limitation90 days from award (S.173(1) clock); deposit: Rs.25,000 or 50% of the awarded amount, whichever is less (first proviso to S.173(1); the second proviso is the delay-condonation proviso); no appeal where the amount in dispute in the appeal is less than Rs.1,00,000 (S.173(2)); exclusion of time under S.12 applies via S.29(2) Limitation Act. **Related:** OP(C) vs MACA route, condonation. **Stay of disbursement during appeal?** Only by express interim order with deposit/conditions. ## Transfer petition under Section 24 CPC – shifting a civil case between courts Suit / appeal / proceeding pending in a court where trial is inconvenient, or connected matters are spread across courts and need consolidation. What it involvesConvenience of parties and witnesses, subject-matter situs, avoidance of multiplicity and conflicting findings. Relevant lawSec.24 CPC – High Court and District Court may transfer a suit, appeal or other proceeding at any stage (notice and hearing; transfer within the courts subordinate to the transferring court). ForumHigh Court of Kerala (Tr.P.(C)) for transfer across districts / to or from the High Court; District Court Ernakulam for intra-district transfer. Procedure & stageTr.P.(C) with case details, hardship grounds and pending-proceedings chart; notice to parties; stay of proceedings before the transferor court where needed. RemedyTransfer to the convenient court with directions to consolidate connected matters. High Court connectionEntirely HC – Tr.P.(C) filed and decided before the High Court of Kerala. Documents normally requiredPlaint / case numbers, address proofs, hardship grounds (distance, health, finance), prior orders. LimitationAt any stage under S.24 – no limitation prescribed; file before evidence closes, as delay weakens the convenience grounds. **Related:** Family transfer petition, execution transfer, condonation. **Can transfer be sought after evidence has begun?** Yes – S.24 permits at any stage, but the convenience ground is tested on the record. ## Original Petition (Civil) under Article 227 against execution court order Execution order exceeding decree or violating execution procedure. What it involvesDecree-execution mapping, delivery/attachment audit, supervisory prayer. Relevant lawConstitution Art. 227 (primary only); CPC execution provisions referenced case-specifically. ForumHigh Court of Kerala (OP(C)). Procedure & stagePost-order filing with stay of delivery/auction where applicable. RemedyInterim: stay of delivery/sale. Final: set aside/remand. High Court connectionHC execution-supervision in Kerala. Documents normally requiredDecree, execution petition, impugned order. LimitationBefore delivery/auction confirmation; urgency governs. **Related:** Auction-process writs; review. **Decree re-decided?** No — execution-scope review. **Third-party claims?** Claim-petition route disclosed. ## Original Petition (Civil) under Article 227 against Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal interim order MACT interim order (award disbursement, impleadment, evidence closure) with procedural error. What it involvesTribunal-record audit, supervisory grounds, stay prayer. Relevant lawConstitution Art. 227 (primary only); Motor Vehicles Act procedure referenced. ForumHigh Court of Kerala (OP(C)). Procedure & stagePost-order filing; disbursement stay where applicable. RemedyInterim: stay of disbursement/proceedings. Final: directions/remand. High Court connectionHC MACT-supervision practice in Kerala. Documents normally requiredClaim petition, interim order, tribunal records. LimitationBefore disbursal; prompt filing. **Related:** MACT final-award appeals are statutory appeals (noted as referral assessment); caveat. **Final award by OP(C)?** No — statutory appeal route. **Disbursal stayed?** Apportionment conditions apply. ## RERA authority and appellate tribunal orders — writ versus statutory appeal note Adverse RERA authority order in builder-buyer or project dispute. What it involvesRERA-record review, statutory-appeal mapping, writ-scope advice. Relevant lawRERA Act, 2016 appellate provisions (primary only; referral assessment). ForumRERA Appellate Tribunal / High Court statutory appeal as provided — referral mapping. High Court of Kerala writ only on narrow jurisdictional grounds. Procedure & stageAppeal-first assessment; writ where jurisdictional void shown. RemedyRelief through statutory appeal; HC interim only within writ-scope exception. High Court connectionLimited HC writ connection; chamber maps the correct appellate track and supports writ only where maintainable. Documents normally requiredAgreement for sale, RERA orders, payment records. LimitationStatutory appeal deadlines strictly tracked. **Related:** Consumer-commission certiorari note; execution OP(C). **Direct writ faster?** Appeal is the prescribed route; writ exceptional. **Possession/refund?** Forum follows statutory cascade. More in this area ## Civil, property & consumer matters: other matters - [Civil suits — recovery, contracts, injunction, declaration and partition](https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-suits/) - Civil appeals, revisions and execution - [Property, revenue and RERA](https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/property-revenue-rera/) - [Land, revenue and local-body writs](https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/land-revenue-local-body/) - [Consumer disputes](https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/consumer/) [Every matter in this area, on one page →](https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/) [Civil, property & consumer matters: the practice area →](https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/) Procedure guides - [Consumer Complaint Kerala: Limits & Appeals](https://advaslam.com/guides/consumer-complaint-kerala-district-state-limits/) Contact [WhatsApp](https://wa.me/919497240215?text=Hello%2C%20I%20found%20advaslam.com%20and%20would%20like%20to%20discuss%20a%20matter.) [contact@advaslam.com](mailto:contact@advaslam.com) [+91 94972 40215](tel:+919497240215) 3rd Floor, Lalan Towers (KGL Builders), Vanchi Square, High Court Junction, Ernakulam, Kerala 682031 · Monday – Saturday, 10:00 – 18:30 (by appointment) ```json {"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https://advaslam.com/#website","url":"https://advaslam.com","name":"Adv. K J Muhammed Aslam","alternateName":"advaslam.com","publisher":{"@id":"https://advaslam.com/#person"},"inLanguage":"en-IN"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://advaslam.com/#person","name":"K J Muhammed Aslam","alternateName":["Adv. K J Muhammed Aslam","Advocate K J Muhammed Aslam","Muhammed Aslam K J","Adv. Aslam"],"honorificPrefix":"Adv.","jobTitle":"Advocate","description":"Advocate enrolled with the Bar Council of Kerala, practising from High Court Junction, Ernakulam: cyber and technology law, data protection (DPDP), business, banking and IPR, and litigation before the High Court of Kerala and the courts at Ernakulam.","url":"https://advaslam.com/profile/","image":"https://advaslam.com/og.png","telephone":"+919497240215","email":"contact@advaslam.com","address":{"@type":"PostalAddress","streetAddress":"3rd Floor, Lalan Towers (KGL Builders), Vanchi Square, High Court Junction","addressLocality":"Ernakulam","addressRegion":"Kerala","postalCode":"682031","addressCountry":"IN"},"alumniOf":{"@type":"CollegeOrUniversity","name":"Bharata Mata School of Legal Studies"},"memberOf":[{"@type":"Organization","name":"Bar Council of Kerala","url":"https://barcouncilkerala.org/lawyer-registry-list"},{"@type":"Organization","name":"Kerala High Court Advocates' Association","url":"https://khcaa.com/"}],"identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"Bar Council of Kerala Enrolment No.","value":"K/001823/2026"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"KHCAA Membership No.","value":"OAJ 358"}],"knowsAbout":["Information Technology Act 2000","Cyber crime law","Technology law and technology contracts","Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023","DPDP compliance","Data protection and privacy law","Business and commercial law","Contract drafting and negotiation","Banking and finance law","Negotiable Instruments Act cheque dishonour","SARFAESI Act","Intellectual property law","Copyright and trademark law","Patent infringement","GST and income-tax law","Blockchain and cryptocurrency technology","Web3 wallets and NFTs","Drone regulation and DigitalSky framework","Writ petitions under Article 226","Criminal law","Civil and consumer litigation","Family and succession law","Service and labour law","Legal drafting","Mediation and dispute resolution"],"knowsLanguage":["en","ml"],"workLocation":{"@id":"https://advaslam.com/#practice"},"hasCredential":[{"@type":"EducationalOccupationalCredential","credentialCategory":"Enrolment as an advocate","identifier":"K/001823/2026","recognizedBy":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Bar Council of Kerala"},"description":"Enrolled as an advocate with the Bar Council of Kerala (K/001823/2026), 2026"},{"@type":"EducationalOccupationalCredential","credentialCategory":"degree","educationalLevel":"Bachelor","recognizedBy":{"@type":"CollegeOrUniversity","name":"Bharata Mata School of Legal Studies"},"description":"BBA LLB (Hons.), Bharata Mata School of Legal Studies (2025)"},{"@type":"EducationalOccupationalCredential","credentialCategory":"Remote Pilot Certificate","recognizedBy":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Directorate General of Civil Aviation, India"},"description":"DGCA Remote Pilot Certificate, issued 2022"}],"subjectOf":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Govind Babu v. State of Kerala (Crl.M.C. No. 5640 of 2026, 2026:KER:69496)","url":"https://indiankanoon.org/doc/151180872/","datePublished":"2026-09-10","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"High Court of Kerala"}},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Viji Sagar v. State of Kerala (Crl.M.C. No. 1603 of 2026, 2026:KER:20803)","url":"https://indiankanoon.org/doc/193042273/","datePublished":"2026-03-09","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"High Court of Kerala"}},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Anjana v. Manoharan A.P. (C.R.P. No. 442 of 2025, 2026:KER:10054)","url":"https://indiankanoon.org/doc/68585852/","datePublished":"2026-02-05","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"High Court of Kerala"}}],"sameAs":["https://www.linkedin.com/in/azlubro","https://portal.khcaa.com/advocate?id=10480","https://lexosys.com"]},{"@type":"LegalService","@id":"https://advaslam.com/#practice","name":"Adv. K J Muhammed Aslam — Advocate, Ernakulam","url":"https://advaslam.com","image":"https://advaslam.com/og.png","telephone":"+919497240215","email":"contact@advaslam.com","address":{"@type":"PostalAddress","streetAddress":"3rd Floor, Lalan Towers (KGL Builders), Vanchi Square, High Court Junction","addressLocality":"Ernakulam","addressRegion":"Kerala","postalCode":"682031","addressCountry":"IN"},"geo":{"@type":"GeoCoordinates","latitude":9.9889,"longitude":76.2748},"hasMap":"https://www.google.com/maps/search/?api=1&query=Lalan+Towers+High+Court+Junction+Ernakulam","areaServed":[{"@type":"City","name":"Ernakulam"},{"@type":"City","name":"Kochi"},{"@type":"State","name":"Kerala"},{"@type":"Country","name":"India"}],"openingHoursSpecification":{"@type":"OpeningHoursSpecification","dayOfWeek":["Monday","Tuesday","Wednesday","Thursday","Friday","Saturday"],"opens":"10:00","closes":"18:30"},"founder":{"@id":"https://advaslam.com/#person"},"knowsAbout":["Cyber crime and IT Act matters","Data protection and DPDP Act compliance","Business, banking, intellectual property and tax","Legal drafting","Criminal law: bail, quash and appeals","Writ petitions before the High Court of Kerala","Civil, property and consumer matters","Family and succession matters","Service and labour matters"]},{"@type":"CollectionPage","name":"Civil appeals, revisions and execution","description":"Civil appeals, revisions and execution: 24 matters, each with the law, forum, procedure, documents and limitation. RFA against Sub Court decree –…","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/","inLanguage":"en-IN","dateModified":"2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z","isPartOf":{"@id":"https://advaslam.com/#website"},"author":{"@id":"https://advaslam.com/#person"},"mainEntity":{"@type":"ItemList","numberOfItems":24,"itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"RFA against Sub Court decree – Ernakulam","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#rfa-against-sub-court-decree-ernakulam"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"RFA valuation and court-fee check","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#rfa-valuation-and-court-fee-check"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"RSA – substantial question of law","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#rsa-substantial-question-of-law"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"RSA – concurrent findings challenge","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#rsa-concurrent-findings-challenge"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":5,"name":"MFA against Order 43 appealable orders","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#mfa-against-order-43-appealable-orders"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":6,"name":"CMA against temporary injunction – Or.39 R.1-2","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#cma-against-temporary-injunction-or39-r1-2"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":7,"name":"CRP – civil revision","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#crp-civil-revision"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":8,"name":"OP(C) – Article 227 supervisory","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#opc-article-227-supervisory"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":9,"name":"Caveat – Section 148A CPC","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#caveat-section-148a-cpc"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":10,"name":"Execution petition – Order 21","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#execution-petition-order-21"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":11,"name":"Execution – Or.21 Rule 32 disobedience","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#execution-or21-rule-32-disobedience"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":12,"name":"Transferred decree execution","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#transferred-decree-execution"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":13,"name":"Condonation of delay – appeals","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#condonation-of-delay-appeals"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":14,"name":"Ex-parte decree – Or.IX R.13 vs Sec.96 appeal","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#ex-parte-decree-orix-r13-vs-sec96-appeal"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":15,"name":"Cross-objection – Or.XLI R.22","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#cross-objection-orxli-r22"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":16,"name":"Stay of execution – Or.XLI R.5","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#stay-of-execution-orxli-r5"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":17,"name":"LAR appeal – compensation enhancement (Sec.74 RFCTLARR)","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#lar-appeal-compensation-enhancement-sec74-rfctlarr"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":18,"name":"Settlement / mediation referral in appeals – Sec.89","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#settlement-mediation-referral-in-appeals-sec89"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":19,"name":"RCR – rent-control revision (Kerala Buildings Lease & Rent Control Act)","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#rcr-rent-control-revision-kerala-buildings-lease-rent-control-act"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":20,"name":"MACA – MACT award quantum appeal (S.173 MV Act)","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#maca-mact-award-quantum-appeal-s173-mv-act"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":21,"name":"Transfer petition under Section 24 CPC – shifting a civil case between courts","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#transfer-petition-under-section-24-cpc-shifting-a-civil-case-between-courts"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":22,"name":"Original Petition (Civil) under Article 227 against execution court order","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#original-petition-civil-under-article-227-against-execution-court-order"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":23,"name":"Original Petition (Civil) under Article 227 against Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal interim order","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#original-petition-civil-under-article-227-against-motor-accidents-claims-tribunal-interim-order"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":24,"name":"RERA authority and appellate tribunal orders — writ versus statutory appeal note","url":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#rera-authority-and-appellate-tribunal-orders-writ-versus-statutory-appeal-note"}]}},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https://advaslam.com/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Practice","item":"https://advaslam.com/practice/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Civil, property & consumer matters","item":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"Matters","item":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":5,"name":"Civil appeals, revisions and execution","item":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/"}]},{"@type":"FAQPage","@id":"https://advaslam.com/practice/civil-consumer/matters/civil-appeals-revisions-execution/#faq","isPartOf":{"@id":"https://advaslam.com/#website"},"mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"Can new evidence be filed in RFA?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Only under Or.XLI R.27 leave, not as of right."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Is fee refunded if appeal settles?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"As per refund rules on compromise – court orders."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Can concurrent facts be reopened?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Only if perverse / no evidence / misreading – narrow."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Is disagreement with appreciation enough?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"No – must show legal flaw."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Are all interim orders appealable?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"No – only Or.43 enumerated orders; others via OP(C)."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Does filing appeal automatically stay injunction?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"No – separate stay needed."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"CRP vs OP(C)?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"CRP under Sec.115; OP(C) under Art.227 where revision barred – grounds overlap but source differs."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Can OP(C) re-argue merits?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"No – confined to jurisdictional / manifest error."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Does caveat guarantee no adverse order?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"No – only guarantees hearing."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Is fresh suit needed if judgment-debtor transferred assets?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"No – use attachment + voidable transfer remedies."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Is R.32 a contempt?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"It is execution-coercion; separate Contempt of Court Act remedy may co-exist."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Can transferee court vary decree?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"No – only execute; variation goes back to passing court."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Is 10-day delay automatic?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"No – each day needs explanation."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Can both be pursued together?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Election and stay strategy matters – simultaneous prosecution needs careful drafting to avoid conflict."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Must cross-objector have appealed?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"No – that is the point of R.22."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Does mere filing of appeal stay execution?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"No – express stay order required."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Can new comparables be filed in appeal?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"With leave and proof they were unavailable earlier."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Is mediation admission usable if talks fail?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"No – confidential and without prejudice."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Fresh evidence in revision?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Only on legality record – no re-trial."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Stay of disbursement during appeal?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Only by express interim order with deposit/conditions."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Can transfer be sought after evidence has begun?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Yes – S.24 permits at any stage, but the convenience ground is tested on the record."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Decree re-decided?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"No — execution-scope review."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Third-party claims?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Claim-petition route disclosed."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Final award by OP(C)?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"No — statutory appeal route."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Disbursal stayed?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Apportionment conditions apply."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Direct writ faster?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Appeal is the prescribed route; writ exceptional."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Possession/refund?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Forum follows statutory cascade."}}]}]} ```