Cyber fraud, freeze & takedown

Harassment, sextortion and defamation

24 matters from the Cyber fraud, freeze & takedown index. Each entry sets out the problem, the law, the forum, the procedure, the documents usually needed and the limitation clock. General information only — verify the current position on your facts before acting.

Contents
  1. Online stalking in Kerala – repeated follow, messages, monitoring (BNS 78)
  2. Sextortion – intimate photo/video threat for money or more images
  3. Revenge porn / non-consensual intimate image (NCII) sharing – ex-partner upload
  4. Deepfake / morphed photo-video – face swapped onto explicit content
  5. Fake profile in victim's name – Instagram / Facebook / matrimonial impersonation
  6. Identity theft – PAN/Aadhaar/photo used for SIM, loan, or account
  7. Online defamation – post, video, review alleging crime/fraud against person/business
  8. Hacked account – email / Instagram / business page taken over
  9. Voyeurism – photo/video of private act without consent (BNS 77)
  10. Cyberbullying / college ragging chat abuse – group targeting student
  11. Accused-side – harassment allegation from failed relationship / dispute
  12. Accused-side – defamation complaint against you for review/complaint
  13. Civil injunction – stop circulation + de-index prayer drafting
  14. 2-hour intimate-image grievance track – impersonation content (Rule 3(2)(b))
  15. Workplace / college online harassment record – ICC + police parallel
  16. Child-targeted abuse image complaint – POCSO + IT 67B path (facts only)
  17. Business-review extortion – "pay or 1-star / expose video stays
  18. Matrimonial-site misuse – fake groom/bride + money/photo demand
  19. Doxxing – address/phone/child school published to harass
  20. Non-consensual recording in lodge/hostel/PG – hidden camera allegation
  21. Image-misuse by lender/recovery agent – contact-list broadcast threat
  22. Comment-section pile-on / coordinated trolling – journalist / doctor / teacher targeted
  23. Apology / correction vs trial – what public statement is safe during case
  24. Evidence bundle for harassment trial – full-thread + BSA 63 + 105 video

Online stalking in Kerala – repeated follow, messages, monitoring (BNS 78)

Repeated messages/follows despite blocking; fear at home/college.

What it involvesCourse of conduct + fear/alarm; platform + police tracks.
Relevant lawBNS 78 (stalking – primary); IT 67/67A add only where obscene/sexual content.
ForumSHO/Women & Cyber cells + NCRP; platform Rule 3(2) grievance.
Procedure & stagePreserve full thread (no selective delete); BNSS 173 complaint; protection/support request.
RemedyFIR + restraint/bail conditions; takedown.
High Court connectionHC bail-cancellation / protection direction where threat persists.
Documents normally requiredComplete chats, IDs/URLs, block/report tickets, ID proof, NCRP ack.
LimitationNo fixed statutory period – preserve and complain promptly; protection/support urgency.
Blocked – enough?
Preserve first, then block + complain – deletion weakens proof.

Sextortion – intimate photo/video threat for money or more images

Threat to publish unless money/images sent; panic payment pressure.

What it involvesExtortion + privacy violation; often organised handler.
Relevant lawBNS 308(2) extortion, 351 intimidation; IT 66E (privacy), 67/67A (obscene/sexual publication).
ForumCyber PS (women-sensitive handling where applicable) + NCRP; platform grievance.
Procedure & stageDo not pay further; preserve threat + payment trail; BNSS 173 FIR; takedown parallel.
RemedyFreeze + takedown + prosecution; interim injunction where identifiable publisher.
High Court connectionHC in-camera/privacy prayers; writ for persistent non-removal.
Documents normally requiredThreats, URLs/IDs, UTRs, platform tickets, ID.
LimitationTakedown – Rule 3(2) ack 24 hrs; intimate-image track 2-hr removal effort (see entry on this page).
Paid once – will it stop?
Usually escalates – stop, preserve, complain.

Revenge porn / non-consensual intimate image (NCII) sharing – ex-partner upload

Private images shared to friends/sites after breakup.

What it involvesConsent-based offence; rapid spread control.
Relevant lawIT 66E, 67/67A; BNS 79 (insult to modesty – where ingredients), 308/351 where threats.
ForumCyber PS + NCRP; platform grievance + StopNCII-type hash where available.
Procedure & stageURL-by-URL preservation (hash/URL/time); platform + NCRP + FIR same day; BSA 63 chain.
RemedyRemoval + de-index request + prosecution; civil injunction.
High Court connectionHC gag/privacy + intermediary-direction prayers in persistent-circulation cases.
Documents normally requiredURLs, screenshots with time, reporter tickets, ID, FIR/NCRP.
Limitation2-hr intimate-image removal track (r.3(2)(b)) + ack 24 hrs (r.3(2)(a)(i)) – IT Rules as amended by G.S.R. 120(E) dated 10.02.2026, w.e.f. 20.02.2026.
Consented to capture – case lost?
Capture consent is not distribution consent – record matters.

Deepfake / morphed photo-video – face swapped onto explicit content

Morphed images circulated as if real; reputation + family distress.

What it involvesForgery/personation + obscenity + defamation overlap.
Relevant lawIT 66E, 66D (personation), 67/67A; BNS 319(2), 336 forgery-type (where ingredients), 356 defamation. IT Rules 2021 as amended by G.S.R. 120(E) (10.02.2026, w.e.f. 20.02.2026): r.3(3) – intermediaries offering synthetic-content (SGI) tools must deploy measures to prevent unlawful SGI and label other SGI with permanent metadata/unique identifier where technically feasible; r.4(1A) – SSMI user declaration + label.
ForumCyber PS + NCRP; platform grievance; FSL for authenticity.
Procedure & stagePreserve original vs morphed + circulation path; FSL opinion via IO; BSA 63.
RemedyTakedown + prosecution + injunction; correction statement via court, not press trial.
High Court connectionHC injunction/writ where platforms slow on morph complaints.
Documents normally requiredOriginals, morphed copies, URLs, tickets, FSL request.
LimitationNo fixed statutory period – preserve originals and report promptly; morphed intimate/impersonation images fall in the 2-hr r.3(2)(b) removal track.
Obviously fake – still offence?
Yes – circulation as if real sustains complaint.

Fake profile in victim's name – Instagram / Facebook / matrimonial impersonation

Profile with victim photos messaging others / soliciting.

What it involvesIdentity theft + personation + obscenity where misused.
Relevant lawIT 66C (identity theft), 66D; BNS 319(2); IT 67 add where obscene.
ForumPlatform impersonation report + NCRP + Cyber PS.
Procedure & stageProfile URL + follower/message preservation; platform ticket + FIR; BSA 63.
RemedySuspension + disclosure for trial + prosecution.
High Court connectionHC disclosure-direction where platform awaits police channel.
Documents normally requiredFake vs real profile PDFs, URLs, message samples, tickets, ID.
LimitationNo fixed statutory period – platform impersonation notice + NCRP promptly.
Report only?
Report + NCRP/FIR – report alone rarely preserves disclosure.

Identity theft – PAN/Aadhaar/photo used for SIM, loan, or account

Loan/SIM in victim's KYC without knowledge.

What it involvesKYC forgery + credit/CRIF impact.
Relevant lawIT 66C; BNS 319, 336/340 forgery-type (where ingredients); IT 72A civil penalty (since 30.11.2023) where a service provider discloses in breach of contract.
ForumCyber PS; lender/TSP grievance; CIC dispute.
Procedure & stageKYC-copy demand via IO; lender fraud-mark request; CIC dispute; BNSS 173 FIR.
RemedyFraud-mark + closure + prosecution; correction.
High Court connectionWrit vs public lender/bureau for non-speaking rejection after remedy.
Documents normally requiredKYC misuse proof, lender letters, CIC report, FIR/NCRP.
LimitationNo fixed statutory period – fraud-mark/CIC dispute promptly; CICRA s.21(3) update request – 30 days.
Pay loan to clear CIBIL?
No – fraud-mark track first.

Online defamation – post, video, review alleging crime/fraud against person/business

False post alleges cheating/affair/crime; shares rising.

What it involvesFalse + publication + harm; truth/exception is trial issue.
Relevant lawBNS 356 (defamation – primary); BNSS complaint procedure; civil injunction parallel.
ForumMagistrate complaint (criminal defamation) + civil court (injunction/damages); platform grievance.
Procedure & stageURL-wise preservation + witness reach proof; grievance + legal notice + complaint/suit.
RemedyTakedown/injunction + damages + prosecution per track.
High Court connectionHC in revision/appeal; interim-relief modification – plead exact URLs.
Documents normally requiredURLs with time/reach, tickets, notice, ID/business proof.
LimitationCriminal complaint – file promptly; cognizance bar – 3 years (BNSS 514; BNS 356(2) punishable up to 2 years; court may extend under s.519); civil damages – 1 year (Limitation Act, Art 75 libel – from publication; Art 76 slander).
True post – defamation?
Truth for the public good (BNS 356 Exception 1) is a defence at trial – facts only.

Hacked account – email / Instagram / business page taken over

Password/2FA changed; recovery fails; misuse in owner's name.

What it involvesUnauthorised access + personation trail.
Relevant lawIT 66 (computer-related offence), 43; IT 66C/66D where identity misused; BNS 318 where fraud follows.
ForumPlatform hack-recovery + NCRP + Cyber PS.
Procedure & stageRecovery + log preservation (login alerts/IPs); grievance + FIR; BSA 63 for logs.
RemedyRecovery + disclosure + prosecution.
High Court connectionHC direction where business-page takeover stalls after police channel.
Documents normally requiredLogin alerts, recovery tickets, misuse samples, NCRP/FIR.
LimitationNo fixed statutory period – recovery/log preservation immediately; BSA 63 near filing.
Change password only?
Also revoke sessions/apps + preserve logs first.

Cyberbullying / college ragging chat abuse – group targeting student

Memes/abuse in class groups; attendance/mental-health impact.

What it involvesHarassment + institutional duty + platform track.
Relevant lawBNS 79/351/356 per content; IT 67 where obscene; UGC/institutional norms for college track.
ForumInstitution ICC/anti-ragging + Cyber PS/NCRP + platform grievance.
Procedure & stageFull-thread preservation; institution + police parallel; counselling note.
RemedyTakedown + inquiry + prosecution per gravity.
High Court connectionHC writ where institution/police silent on student safety.
Documents normally requiredThreads, group info, institution complaints, tickets.
LimitationNo fixed statutory period – full-thread preservation and complaint promptly.
Leave group?
Preserve export first, then mute/exit + complain.

Accused-side – harassment allegation from failed relationship / dispute

Messages quoted out of context after breakup/business fallout.

What it involvesConsent/context/cessation record; no-contact discipline.
Relevant lawBNS 78/79/351/356 defences on facts; BNSS bail/AB; BSA 63 for full thread.
ForumIO; Sessions/HC bail; Magistrate trial.
Procedure & stageFull thread (not edits); cessation proof; counsel-led statement; strict no-contact.
RemedyBail; discharge/quash where no course-of-conduct proved.
High Court connectionHC AB/quash – complete thread decides.
Documents normally requiredFull export, cessation/block proof, witness context.
LimitationNo fixed statutory period – bail/AB per custody stage; preserve the full thread now.
Delete chats?
No – deletion suggests guilt; preserve full.

Accused-side – defamation complaint against you for review/complaint

Honest review/whistleblow draws 356 notice.

What it involvesTruth/good-faith exception + forum discipline.
Relevant lawBNS 356 Exceptions (e.g., Exc. 1 truth for public good; Exc. 9 good-faith imputation to protect interests); civil truth defence.
ForumMagistrate (complaint); civil court.
Procedure & stageSource bundle for each assertion; reply notice with documents; no fresh publication.
RemedyDischarge/acquittal per proof; suit defence.
High Court connectionHC quash where complaint lacks publication/falsehood prima facie.
Documents normally requiredBills/records for each claim, notice/reply, URLs frozen.
LimitationReply within the time given in the notice; no fixed period for quash – move promptly.
Delete review?
Take advice – deletion timing affects record.

Civil injunction – stop circulation + de-index prayer drafting

FIR filed but links keep mirroring.

What it involvesURL-specific injunction + intermediary implementation.
Relevant lawCPC Order 39 + Specific Relief; IT 79 + Rules grievance record.
ForumCivil court (jurisdiction); HC on appeal/revision.
Procedure & stageExact URLs + irreparable-harm affidavit + platform tickets; John-Doe where unknown mirrors.
RemedyInterim takedown/de-index; final injunction + damages.
High Court connectionHC appeal/revision on injunction orders.
Documents normally requiredURL list, reach proof, tickets, ID, FIR/NCRP.
LimitationInterim relief is urgency-driven – file promptly; damages for libel 1 year from publication (Limitation Act, Art 75); residuary 3 years (Art 113).
One order removes all mirrors?
List known URLs + John-Doe mechanism for mirrors.

2-hour intimate-image grievance track – impersonation content (Rule 3(2)(b))

Platform ticket pending while image spreads.

What it involvesSpecial 2-hour removal-effort track for private-area/nudity/sexual-act/impersonation incl. morphed.
Relevant lawIT Rules Rule 3(2)(b)-(c) (2-hr action on listed intimate-image complaints with details; ack 24 hrs / disposal 7 days).
ForumPlatform Grievance Officer → Grievance Appellate Committee (Rule 3A, 30 days) → court.
Procedure & stageComplaint with details enabling identification; ticket escalation; GAC appeal within 30 days of the Grievance Officer's communication (r.3A(3)).
RemedyRemoval/disable + appellate direction.
High Court connectionWrit where GAC/platform process fails on listed content.
Documents normally requiredURLs, ID proof, detail note, tickets, GAC appeal.
LimitationGAC appeal – 30 days from officer communication.
No ticket number?
Re-file via published grievance page and save ack.

Workplace / college online harassment record – ICC + police parallel

DM harassment by colleague/senior; fears retaliation.

What it involvesInternal + criminal tracks can run together.
Relevant lawPOSH/UGC framework + BNS 78/79/351 per content; IT overlay where electronic.
ForumICC/college cell + SHO/Cyber PS.
Procedure & stageDated internal complaint + NCRP/FIR; preserve; no private mediation on serious heads.
RemedyInquiry + protection + prosecution per gravity.
High Court connectionHC writ where institution buries complaint.
Documents normally requiredDMs, institution complaint, tickets, FIR.
LimitationNo fixed statutory period for the police track; POSH (aggrieved woman) – IC/LC complaint within 3 months of the last incident, extendable by up to 3 months (s.9); inquiry within 90 days (s.11(4)).
Internal or police first?
Both promptly – they serve different reliefs.

Child-targeted abuse image complaint – POCSO + IT 67B path (facts only)

Minor's image misused / sexual content involving child circulated.

What it involvesZero-tolerance track; victim-identity protected; do not forward.
Relevant lawPOCSO + IT 67B (child sexual content) + BNS 78/79/294-type per facts; procedure child-sensitive.
ForumSpecial Juvenile/Cyber + NCRP (report, do not redistribute).
Procedure & stageReport with URL (not copy-spread); victim support; FSL via IO; BSA 63.
RemedyTakedown + prosecution + compensation/support schemes per policy.
High Court connectionHC privacy/in-camera + bail jurisprudence is stringent here – record only.
Documents normally requiredURL/time note, reporter ticket, guardian ID, NCRP/FIR.
LimitationReport immediately – POCSO s.19 reporting duty (SJPU/local police); do not forward.
Forward to prove?
No – forwarding itself risks offence; report by URL.

Business-review extortion – "pay or 1-star / expose video stays

Threat to keep defamatory review/video unless paid.

What it involvesExtortion + defamation + platform-manipulation.
Relevant lawBNS 308, 356; IT 66D/66E per method.
ForumCyber PS + NCRP; platform grievance.
Procedure & stagePreserve demand + review history; platform + FIR parallel; no payment.
RemedyTakedown + prosecution; injunction.
High Court connectionHC injunction/bail overlap where reviewer sues/counter-alleges.
Documents normally requiredDemand chats, review URLs/history, tickets, business proof.
LimitationNo fixed statutory period – preserve the demand and report immediately.
Pay to remove?
No – record demand first.

Matrimonial-site misuse – fake groom/bride + money/photo demand

Profile romance → money/photo demand; family pressure.

What it involvesRomance + personation + extortion pattern.
Relevant lawBNS 318, 319, 308/351 where threats; IT 66C/66D/66E.
ForumPlatform grievance + Cyber PS/NCRP.
Procedure & stageFull profile/chat preservation; platform + FIR; family-support note.
RemedyTakedown + freeze + prosecution.
High Court connectionMulti-state coordination writ where handler outside Kerala.
Documents normally requiredProfile PDFs, chats, UTRs, tickets.
LimitationNo fixed statutory period – preserve profile/chat and report promptly.
Meet to recover?
No – hand over to IO.

Doxxing – address/phone/child school published to harass

Personal data posted to invite harassment.

What it involvesPrivacy + intimidation + platform-takedown.
Relevant lawIT 66E / 72A (civil penalty) per source of disclosure; BNS 351/356 per content; DPDP direction evolving.
ForumPlatform grievance + Cyber PS/NCRP; injunction where persistent.
Procedure & stageURL preservation; takedown + FIR; address-safety steps with police.
RemedyRemoval + prosecution + protection.
High Court connectionHC privacy/injunction where doxxing persists.
Documents normally requiredURLs, disclosure-source note, tickets, FIR.
LimitationNo fixed statutory period – takedown + complaint promptly; address-safety steps at once.
Delete own posts?
Audit privacy settings + preserve evidence first.

Non-consensual recording in lodge/hostel/PG – hidden camera allegation

Camera found / recording suspected in private space.

What it involvesScene preservation + owner/staff trail.
Relevant lawBNS 77; IT 66E; BNS 308/351 where threat.
ForumSHO/Cyber PS immediately; FSL scene via IO (BNSS 105/106).
Procedure & stageDo not disturb scene; call police; device/scene seizure memo with hash.
RemedySeizure + prosecution + injunction on circulation.
High Court connectionHC protection/privacy directions; bail jurisprudence strict.
Documents normally requiredScene photos (without disturbing), booking proof, device details, FIR.
LimitationReport immediately – scene preservation is time-sensitive; no fixed statutory period.
Confront owner?
No – preserve scene and call police.

Image-misuse by lender/recovery agent – contact-list broadcast threat

Recovery agent threatens to send morphed/borrower photo to contacts.

What it involvesCoercive recovery + privacy violation.
Relevant lawBNS 308/351; IT 66E/67 per publication; RBI recovery norms.
ForumCyber PS + RBI Sachet + lender grievance.
Procedure & stagePreserve threat; lender + Sachet + NCRP parallel; permissions revoked.
RemedyProsecution + takedown + regulatory action.
High Court connectionHC writ where threats continue after complaints.
Documents normally requiredThreats, lender ID, APK, Sachet ref, NCRP.
LimitationNo fixed statutory period – preserve the threat and file lender/Sachet/NCRP in parallel at once.
Settle to stop?
Record first – settlement without deletion proof repeats.

Comment-section pile-on / coordinated trolling – journalist / doctor / teacher targeted

Coordinated abuse after post; work affected.

What it involvesMulti-account harassment; incitement vs criticism line.
Relevant lawBNS 79/351/356 per content; IT Rules grievance per post; IT 66A struck down (Shreya Singhal, 2015) – not a valid charge.
ForumPlatform grievance per URL + Cyber PS/NCRP; injunction for persistent handles.
Procedure & stageURL-wise bundle (not bulk allegation); grievance + FIR; BSA 63.
RemedyAccount/post action + prosecution + injunction.
High Court connectionHC free-speech vs protection balance – exact URLs and threats decide.
Documents normally requiredURL bundle with time/reach, tickets, FIR.
LimitationNo fixed statutory period – URL-wise bundle and complaint promptly.
Criticism = offence?
Mere offensiveness without statutory ingredients is not – content-specific record needed.

Apology / correction vs trial – what public statement is safe during case

Parties want to post apology/denial while case pending.

What it involvesContempt + defamation-repeat + evidence risks.
Relevant lawContempt + BNS 356 repeat-publication risk; BSA admissibility of admissions.
ForumCounsel-led; court-recorded statement preferred.
Procedure & stageNo unilateral post; court-noted apology/correction where advised.
RemedyCleaner trial + contempt safety.
High Court connectionHC tests public statements in bail/quash/injunction conduct.
Documents normally requiredDraft statement vetted; court order where recorded.
LimitationNo fixed statutory period – court-recorded statement as advised; unilateral posts risk contempt.
Post apology to end case?
Only through court/counsel – unilateral post can aggravate.

Evidence bundle for harassment trial – full-thread + BSA 63 + 105 video

Screenshots doubted as edited.

What it involvesOriginal device + exports + dual certificates + IO videography.
Relevant lawBSA 63 (certificate signed by person in charge + expert; Schedule Parts A/B); BNSS 105 (AV recording of search/seizure).
ForumTrial court via IO.
Procedure & stageOriginal + hash-noted copy + BSA 63(4) certificate in Schedule form – Part A (party) + Part B (expert), with hash; IO 105 video where seizure.
RemedyAdmissibility; avoids secondary-proof fight.
High Court connectionHC revision/appeal turns on this bundle.
Documents normally requiredOriginal, export, BSA 63 drafts, 105 video memo.
LimitationBSA 63 certificate with the record each time it is submitted for admission (s.63(4)); BNSS 105 video recorded at the search/seizure.
Notarised screenshots enough?
Original + BSA 63 is stronger.

Contact

3rd Floor, Lalan Towers (KGL Builders), Vanchi Square, High Court Junction, Ernakulam, Kerala 682031 · Monday – Saturday, 10:00 – 18:30 (by appointment)

A note before you read on. In keeping with the Bar Council of India Rules, this website provides information about Adv. K J Muhammed Aslam, and general legal information, only to those who seek it of their own accord. It is not an advertisement or solicitation, and nothing here is legal advice. By continuing, you acknowledge you are visiting voluntarily. Full disclaimer.